Tennis predictions 8 September 2026

AI tennis predictions for every singles match: who wins, the most likely set score and the chance of a deciding set, from player ratings built on 57,590 matches.

14Matches
1Tournaments
2Forecast
9,192Players rated

Strongest calls of the day

18:25US Open, MenR27Frances Tiafoe3Alex Michelsen23–1AI prediction70%High confidence30%ForecastTiafoe to win70%Full analysis 15:30US Open, WomenR27Aryna Sabalenka2Linda Noskova12–0AI prediction69%Medium confidence31%ForecastSabalenka to win69%Full analysis

All matches by tournament

WTA US Open, Women

15:30Aryna SabalenkaLinda Noskova
7372
6661
Sabalenka69%2–0
18:25Frances TiafoeAlex Michelsen
53763
76532
Tiafoe70%3–1
19:05Siniakova K / Townsend TBucsa C / Melichar-Martinez N
662
420
Doubles
20:05Carpico B / Filin N SRam R / Salisbury J
6641
7462
Doubles
20:25Gonzalez M / Molteni AGranollers M / Zeballos H
330
662
Doubles
20:25Jiang X / Zhang SDabrowski G / Stefani L
340
662
Doubles
20:40Hsieh S / Ostapenko JMertens E / Shnaider D
530
762
Doubles
21:05Miedler L / Polmans MArevalo M / Pavic M
6631
7462
Doubles
21:05Schnaitter J / Wallner MHarrison C / Skupski N
360
672
Doubles
22:05Nys H / Roger-Vasselin EAndreozzi G / Guinard M
7461
6672
Doubles
22:20Routliffe E / Sutjiadi AKrueger A / Montgomery R
630
762
Doubles
22:45Krawietz K / Puetz TCash J / Glasspool L
772
660
Doubles
22:50Heliovaara H / Patten HCabral F / Tracy J
662
440
Doubles
23:25Bolelli S / Vavassori AKrajicek A / Mektic N
4772
6661
Doubles
How these predictions are made
Every player carries a rating that moves after each match by how surprising the result was — beating a stronger opponent is worth more than beating a weaker one, and a win in an ATP or WTA draw counts for more than one in an ITF event. The win probability comes from the gap between two ratings, adjusted by their head-to-head record. The set score follows from that probability rather than being guessed separately. Where a player has played too few matches, or has never played at tour level, the rating is pulled back towards the average and the match is marked as thin data instead of being dressed up as a confident call. Doubles are excluded: the rating measures singles.