WTA predictions for tomorrow 24 September 2026
WTA matches only: win probability, most likely set score and deciding-set chance for every singles match, from ratings built on 57,590 matches.
12Matches
3Tournaments
8Forecast
9,192Players rated
Strongest calls of the day
10:30SingaporeR5Tatiana ProzorovaAlexandra Eala0–2AI prediction17%High confidence83%ForecastEala to win83%Full analysis 11:40SingaporeR5Maria SakkariNao Hibino2–0AI prediction66%Medium confidence34%ForecastSakkari to win66%Full analysis 05:00SingaporeR5Talia GibsonViktoria Morvayova2–0AI prediction61%Medium confidence39%ForecastGibson to win61%Full analysis
All matches by tournament
WTA Seoul
03:00Anna BondarAlina Charaeva
–
–
Bondar52%2–0›03:00Yexin MaKimberly Birrell–
–
Birrell54%0–2›05:10Martins I / Zarazua RChong E / Hozumi E
06:00Yeonwoo KuElena-Gabriela Ruse–
–
Doubles–
–
Ruse68%0–2›08:00Jelena OstapenkoTaylah Preston–
–
Ostapenko57%2–0›09:10Chan H / Wu FBack D / Jang S J
–
–
DoublesWTA Singapore
05:00Talia GibsonViktoria Morvayova
–
–
Gibson61%2–0›06:10Xinyu WangJoanna Garland–
–
Wang55%2–0›10:30Tatiana ProzorovaAlexandra Eala–
–
Eala83%0–2›11:40Maria SakkariNao Hibino–
–
Sakkari66%2–0›WTA Singapore Doubles
03:00Hunter S / Krawczyk DTang Q / Xu Y
–
–
Doubles07:00Costoulas S / Gibson TMladenovic K / Panova A
–
–
Doubles
How these predictions are made
Every player carries a rating that moves after each match by how surprising the result was — beating a stronger opponent is worth more than beating a weaker one, and a win in an ATP or WTA draw counts for more than one in an ITF event. The win probability comes from the gap between two ratings, adjusted by their head-to-head record. The set score follows from that probability rather than being guessed separately. Where a player has played too few matches, or has never played at tour level, the rating is pulled back towards the average and the match is marked as thin data instead of being dressed up as a confident call. Doubles are excluded: the rating measures singles.
Every player carries a rating that moves after each match by how surprising the result was — beating a stronger opponent is worth more than beating a weaker one, and a win in an ATP or WTA draw counts for more than one in an ITF event. The win probability comes from the gap between two ratings, adjusted by their head-to-head record. The set score follows from that probability rather than being guessed separately. Where a player has played too few matches, or has never played at tour level, the rating is pulled back towards the average and the match is marked as thin data instead of being dressed up as a confident call. Doubles are excluded: the rating measures singles.