ATP predictions for tomorrow 24 September 2026
ATP matches only: win probability, most likely set score and deciding-set chance for every singles match, from ratings built on 57,590 matches.
21Matches
3Tournaments
20Forecast
9,192Players rated
Strongest calls of the day
11:30HangzhouR6Zhizhen ZhangColeman Wong0–2AI prediction15%High confidence85%ForecastWong to win85%Full analysis 08:30ChengduR6Juan Manuel CerundoloYi Zhou2–0AI prediction82%High confidence18%ForecastCerundolo to win82%Full analysis 05:00HangzhouR6Dane SweenyTaro Daniel2–0AI prediction80%High confidence20%ForecastSweeny to win80%Full analysis
All matches by tournament
ATP Chengdu
05:00James DuckworthLorenzo Sonego
–
–
Duckworth58%2–0›05:00Nuno BorgesCamilo Ugo Carabelli–
–
Borges65%2–0›05:00Tallon GriekspoorDenis Shapovalov–
–
Shapovalov57%0–2›06:10Juncheng ShangAdrian Mannarino–
–
Shang61%2–0›06:10Miomir KecmanovićNikoloz Basilashvili–
–
Basilashvili58%0–2›06:10Moise KouameAlexandre Muller–
–
Kouame60%2–0›07:20Aleksandr ShevchenkoHubert Hurkacz–
–
Hurkacz68%0–2›07:20Lloyd HarrisAleksandar Kovačević–
–
Harris77%2–0›08:00Martin Damm JrShintaro Mochizuki–
–
Jr52%2–0›08:30Juan Manuel CerundoloYi Zhou–
–
Cerundolo82%2–0›ATP Hangzhou
05:00Dane SweenyTaro Daniel
–
–
Sweeny80%2–0›05:00Sho ShimabukuroHugo Gaston–
–
Shimabukuro63%2–0›05:30Jaime FariaTerence Atmane–
–
Faria68%2–0›06:10Fábián MarozsánAlex Bolt–
–
Bolt64%0–2›06:10Rinky HijikataDalibor Svrčina–
–
Hijikata70%2–0›06:40Yunchaokete BuMichael Zheng–
–
Zheng70%0–2›07:20Mattia BellucciKamil Majchrzak–
–
Majchrzak51%0–2›07:50Jie CuiAdolfo Daniel Vallejo–
–
Vallejo57%0–2›08:30Fajing SunRoman Safiullin–
–
Safiullin67%0–2›11:30Zhizhen ZhangColeman Wong–
–
Wong85%0–2›ATP Hangzhou Doubles
07:20Arends S / Pel DReyes-Varela M A / Stalder R
–
–
Doubles
How these predictions are made
Every player carries a rating that moves after each match by how surprising the result was — beating a stronger opponent is worth more than beating a weaker one, and a win in an ATP or WTA draw counts for more than one in an ITF event. The win probability comes from the gap between two ratings, adjusted by their head-to-head record. The set score follows from that probability rather than being guessed separately. Where a player has played too few matches, or has never played at tour level, the rating is pulled back towards the average and the match is marked as thin data instead of being dressed up as a confident call. Doubles are excluded: the rating measures singles.
Every player carries a rating that moves after each match by how surprising the result was — beating a stronger opponent is worth more than beating a weaker one, and a win in an ATP or WTA draw counts for more than one in an ITF event. The win probability comes from the gap between two ratings, adjusted by their head-to-head record. The set score follows from that probability rather than being guessed separately. Where a player has played too few matches, or has never played at tour level, the rating is pulled back towards the average and the match is marked as thin data instead of being dressed up as a confident call. Doubles are excluded: the rating measures singles.